Skip to content
Companies Act / IEPF

340. Unpaid/Unclaimed Dividend: Transfer to IEPF and Claim Process

Seven years of unclaimed dividend triggers a transfer of both the dividend and the underlying shares to the IEPF. The shareholder’s claim is not extinguished; it is redirected to a statutory fund and can be reclaimed through Form IEPF-5.

29 Oct 20262 min read

The Seven-Year Trigger

Under Section 124, dividends that remain unpaid or unclaimed for seven consecutive years from the date of transfer to the unpaid dividend account must be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund, along with the underlying shares. The company must also transfer the dividend amounts that have remained unpaid for seven years. The transfer is not discretionary; it is a statutory consequence of the expiry of the seven-year period.

The Company’s Transfer Mechanics

The company must maintain an unpaid dividend account and transfer the unpaid amounts to the IEPF within the prescribed timeline after the seven-year period. The company must appoint a nodal officer for IEPF matters and file the requisite statements with the IEPF Authority. The board’s report and the annual return should reflect the transfers.

The Shareholder’s Claim Under IEPF-5

A shareholder whose dividend or shares have been transferred to the IEPF can claim a refund by filing Form IEPF-5 online on the IEPF portal, attaching the prescribed documents, and submitting the physical documents to the company’s nodal officer. The company verifies the claim and sends a verification report to the IEPF Authority, which then examines and approves the refund. The process is document-intensive: identity proof, share certificates or demat statements, entitlement proof, and bank details.

The Entitlement Letter

Before filing IEPF-5, the shareholder should obtain an entitlement letter from the company or the registrar and transfer agent. The entitlement letter confirms the shareholder’s holdings and the dividend amounts transferred. A claim filed without the entitlement letter is typically returned for want of verification.

The Dematerialisation Requirement

Where the claim involves shares transferred to the IEPF, the shareholder must dematerialise the shares before or as part of the claim process. The IEPF Authority credits the shares to the shareholder’s demat account upon approval. A claim that does not address the demat requirement is incomplete.

The Company’s Documentation

The company should maintain: the unpaid dividend register; the seven-year computation; the transfer statements; the IEPF challans; the nodal officer’s records; and the verification reports issued on shareholder claims. A company that cannot produce the transfer records faces a finding of non-compliance with Section 124 independent of any shareholder complaint.

Call to Action: For IEPF transfer reconciliation, IEPF-5 claim support, or nodal officer documentation, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

Process Guideunpaid dividend IEPFunclaimed dividend transferIEPF transfer seven yearsIEPF claim processIEPF-5 filingIEPF refundIEPF shares transferIEPF nodal officerIEPF verification reportIEPF Authorityunpaid dividend accountdividend unpaid accountsection 124 dividendsection 125 IEPFIEPF rules 2016IEPF claim documentsIEPF entitlement letterIEPF dematerialisationIEPF claim timelineIEPF rejectionIEPF legal opinionIEPF compliance checklistIEPF annual transferIEPF board resolutionIEPF disclosureAnuj Desai Associates IEPF advisory
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.