Skip to content
Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 20264 min read

What the Limit Actually Measures

Section 186(2) does not cap a single transaction. It caps the aggregate of four categories at any point in time: loans, guarantees, securities, and investments in securities of other bodies corporate. The compliance question is therefore not “how much is this loan?” but “what is the total outstanding exposure across all four categories, and does it remain within the outer boundary?” A company that monitors each transaction in isolation but never aggregates the book can cross the limit without any single approval file showing a breach.

The Two Formulas and the Higher-of Rule

The prescribed limit is the higher of two computations: sixty per cent of the sum of paid-up share capital, free reserves, and securities premium account; or one hundred per cent of free reserves plus securities premium account. The “higher of” structure means a company with a large free-reserve base may have a limit driven by the second formula, while a company with substantial paid-up capital may be governed by the first. The practical consequence is that the limit must be recalculated after every balance-sheet change, not fixed at the start of the year.

Worked Example and the Aggregation Trap

If paid-up capital is ₹50 crore, free reserves ₹80 crore, and securities premium ₹20 crore, the first formula yields ₹90 crore (60% of ₹150 crore) and the second yields ₹100 crore (100% of ₹100 crore). The limit is ₹100 crore. If outstanding loans, guarantees, and investments total ₹98 crore, a new ₹5 crore loan is not a standalone board matter; it takes the aggregate to ₹103 crore and triggers the special resolution requirement. The approval must be obtained before disbursement, not ratified afterwards.

The Three-Tier Approval Chain

Every transaction covered by Section 186 requires a board resolution at the first tier, regardless of amount. The resolution must be passed at a meeting, not by circulation, and interested directors must disclose and abstain. The second tier is the special resolution, required once the aggregate crosses the prescribed limit. The third tier is the disclosure layer: the financial statements must record the details of loans, guarantees, and investments, and the board’s report must disclose the purpose and the recipient’s identity.

A special resolution under Section 186 does not dispense with the board resolution. It sits above it. Advising a client that shareholder approval “covers” the transaction and that no further board step is required is a recurring error in transaction files.

Inter-Corporate Deposits and the Rate-of-Interest Condition

Section 186(7) requires that a loan under this section carry a rate of interest not lower than the prevailing yield on one-year, three-year, five-year, and ten-year government securities closest to the tenor of the loan. An ICD priced below the G-sec benchmark is a statutory violation even if the aggregate limit is respected and the board resolution is in place. The loan agreement should record the benchmark and the tenor to make the pricing defensible on the face of the document.

When the Limit Does Not Apply

The 60%/100% ceiling does not restrict a company from taking loans or deposits; it restricts the deployment of funds, not the receipt. A loan to a wholly owned subsidiary is exempt from the special resolution requirement, but the board resolution and disclosure obligations remain. A guarantee given in the ordinary course of a lending business may fall outside the section, provided the company is genuinely in the business of lending and the guarantee is not a device to benefit a related party.

Compliance Architecture

Maintain a rolling Section 186 register that aggregates outstanding loans, guarantees, securities, and investments at the close of each board meeting. Recompute the two formulas against the latest audited balance sheet and flag headroom before approving any new deployment. Where the headroom is less than the proposed amount, route the matter through a special resolution in the same meeting cycle rather than after disbursement.

Call to Action: For Section 186 limit certification, resolution drafting, or an inter-corporate exposure review, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

Compliance Guidesection 186 companies act60 100 limit calculationinter-corporate loan limitsection 186 approvalspecial resolution section 186board resolution section 186loan guarantee investment limitpaid up capital free reserves securities premiumsection 186 formulainter corporate deposit complianceICD section 186loan to body corporateinvestment in securities section 186section 186 layer approvalsection 186 penaltysection 186 exemptionloan to wholly owned subsidiarysection 186 board limitsection 186 special resolution thresholdcorporate treasury compliancecompany law lending limitloan guarantee security investment aggregatesection 186 applicabilitysection 186 analysisMCA section 186company loan complianceinvestment compliance Indiasection 186 practical examplefree reserves calculationsecurities premium accountpaid up share capitalsection 186 resolution formatsection 186 registerinter corporate loan documentationguarantee compliancesecurity provision company lawsection 186 auditsection 186 checklistbody corporate definitionforeign subsidiary loan section 186FEMA section 186section 186 and section 185 overlaploan to director section 186subsidiary investment limitsection 186 layersTier 1 board approvalTier 2 special resolutionsection 186 contraventionofficer liability section 186Anuj Desai Associates corporate compliance
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Guarantees & Security

Corporate Guarantees and Section 186: When Is Approval Required?

A corporate guarantee is a Section 186 deployment even when no cash leaves the company. The approval threshold, the aggregate ceiling, and the disclosure obligation are triggered by the exposure, not by disbursement.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.