Skip to content
Companies Act / Investor Relations

Stakeholders Relationship Committee: Handling Investor Grievances

The Stakeholders Relationship Committee is the board-level forum for investor grievances. Its effectiveness is measured not by the number of complaints received but by the time taken to resolve them and the documentation of the resolution.

29 Oct 20262 min read

The Statutory Mandate

Section 178(5) requires the Stakeholders Relationship Committee to consider and resolve the grievances of security holders. The committee’s scope includes: complaints relating to share transfers; non-receipt of dividends; non-receipt of annual reports; non-receipt of refunds; and other investor grievances. The committee must meet at least once a year, and its minutes must record the complaints received, resolved, and pending.

Composition and Quorum

The committee should have a chairperson and at least two other members, with at least one independent director. For listed entities, LODR prescribes specific composition requirements. A committee that does not meet the composition requirement cannot validly discharge its functions.

The Grievance Register

The company should maintain an investor grievance register recording: the complainant’s name; the nature of the grievance; the date of receipt; the action taken; the date of resolution; and the closure communication. The register should be reconciled with the RTA’s records and the SCORES portal for listed entities. A register that is maintained only for the annual report and not for operational tracking is a compliance formality without governance substance.

Resolution Timelines

The committee should adopt internal timelines for resolution—for example, fifteen days for share-transfer complaints and thirty days for dividend complaints—and track adherence. Complaints that remain unresolved beyond the internal timeline should be escalated to the board with a root-cause analysis. A pattern of unresolved complaints is a governance red flag that may attract regulatory scrutiny.

The Annual Report Disclosure

The board’s report must disclose the number of complaints received, resolved, and pending, and the committee’s composition and meetings. For listed entities, the corporate governance report must include the investor grievance details. A disclosure that shows a high pendency rate without an explanation is a reputational and regulatory risk.

Interaction with the RTA and the Board

The committee should review the RTA’s service standards, the turnaround time for share transfers, and the reconciliation of the demat and physical share registers. The committee’s recommendations should be placed before the board with a time-bound action plan. A committee that meets, notes the register, and adjourns without a remediation plan is not discharging its oversight role.

Call to Action: For SRC charter design, investor grievance process review, or annual report disclosure support, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

Compliance Guidestakeholders relationship committeeSRC roleinvestor grievancesshareholder grievance redressalsection 178 SRCSRC compositionSRC meetingsSRC minutesSRC annual reportinvestor complaint handlingshare transfer complaintsdividend complaintsnon-receipt of annual reportIEPF complaintsSCORESSEBI complaint redressalRTA coordinationinvestor grievance registerSRC charterSRC legal opinionAnuj Desai Associates investor grievance advisory
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.