Skip to content
Companies Act / Class Actions

377. Class Action: Reliefs and Damages

The Section 245(1)(g) relief is wide but not unbounded. The NCLAT has clarified that compensation can be claimed from or against the company and its directors, but the relief must be connected to the prejudice alleged and the class represented.

29 Oct 20262 min read

The Statutory Relief Menu

Section 245(1) permits the NCLT to grant relief including: restraining the company from committing an act that is prejudicial; restraining the company from acting on a resolution; declaring a resolution void; restraining the company from acting on a resolution or agreement; requiring the company to initiate action against the directors, auditors, or experts; and awarding damages or compensation. The relief is directed at the conduct that constitutes the prejudice.

The Damages Relief Under Section 245(1)(g)

The NCLAT in the Jindal Poly Films matter held that Section 245(1)(g) permits shareholders to claim damages or compensation from or against the company or its directors. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the relief is confined to the company’s benefit. The language is wide enough to permit a direct claim by the class, provided the prejudice and the loss are established.

The Past-Transaction Relief

The NCLAT upheld the maintainability of a class action challenging past and concluded transactions. The relief may include reversal of the transaction, restoration of the status quo, or compensation. A transaction that was completed and disclosed years earlier is not automatically outside the class-action reach; the question is whether the prejudice continues and whether the relief can be granted without disturbing third-party rights.

The Evidentiary Burden

A class action is not a substitute for a detailed evidentiary hearing. The applicant must establish the prejudice with documents, expert evidence where necessary, and a causal link to the loss. A class action that relies on generalised allegations of mismanagement without specific transactions and quantified loss is likely to fail at the merits stage.

The Interaction with Section 241

The NCLAT has clarified that the availability of a Section 241–242 remedy does not discredit a Section 245 petition if the parameters of Section 245 are met. The two remedies can coexist, but the relief and the class must be distinct. A petitioner cannot use Section 245 to circumvent the Section 244 threshold for a personal oppression claim.

Call to Action: For Section 245 relief strategy, damages quantification, or class action merits defence, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

Compliance Guidesection 245 reliefsclass action damagessection 245(1)(g)class action compensationclass action NCLT reliefclass action damages companyclass action damages directorsclass action damages auditorsclass action damages expertsclass action relief scopeclass action past transactionsclass action concluded transactionsclass action reversalclass action injunctionclass action costsclass action legal opinionAnuj Desai Associates class action relief
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.