Skip to content
Companies Act / Secretarial Audit

334. Secretarial Audit (Section 204): Scope and Form MR-3

Secretarial audit under Section 204 is not a general compliance check. It is a Form MR-3 opinion on the company’s secretarial records against the Companies Act, the rules, the secretarial standards, and the applicable securities laws.

29 Oct 20263 min read

The Applicability Classes

Section 204 applies to every listed company and to every public company with paid-up share capital of ₹50 crore or more, or turnover of ₹250 crore or more. The thresholds are tested against the latest audited financial statements. A private company is not within the mandatory class, though a listed subsidiary or a company that is otherwise covered may trigger the obligation through its group position.

The Form MR-3 Content

Form MR-3 is the prescribed secretarial audit report. It requires the auditor to state whether the company has, during the audit period, complied with the applicable provisions of the Companies Act, the rules, the secretarial standards, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, the Depositories Act, FEMA, and the SEBI Act. The report is annexed to the board’s report, and the board must explain in full every qualification, observation, or remark.

The Scope Beyond the Companies Act

The MR-3 scope is not confined to the Companies Act. For a listed entity, the secretarial auditor must examine compliance with LODR, the insider trading regulations, the takeover code, and the share-based benefit regulations. For a company with foreign investment, FEMA compliance is within scope. An engagement letter that limits the audit to Companies Act filings understates the statutory scope and exposes the auditor to a professional-negligence claim.

The Board’s Explanation Obligation

A board that receives an MR-3 with a qualification cannot simply annex it. Section 204(3) requires the board to explain in full the qualification, observation, or remark. A general statement that “the company has complied with all applicable provisions” in the face of a specific adverse remark is not an explanation; it is a contradiction that undermines the board’s report and may attract regulatory scrutiny.

The Penalty for Contravention

Contravention of Section 204 attracts a penalty of ₹2 lakh on the company, every officer in default, and the company secretary in practice who is in default. The penalty on the practising company secretary is a professional-risk exposure that should be covered by the engagement terms and the auditor’s professional indemnity.

Documentation for the Secretarial Audit File

The file should contain: the engagement letter defining scope; the audit plan referencing the applicable laws and standards; the checklist of records examined; the minutes, registers, and filings tested; the management representations; the draft MR-3; and the board’s explanation for each qualification. A file that contains only the final MR-3 without the testing record is insufficient if the report is challenged.

Call to Action: For Section 204 applicability review, MR-3 scope design, or secretarial audit documentation support, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

Compliance Guidesection 204 secretarial auditForm MR-3secretarial audit applicabilitysecretarial audit scopelisted company secretarial auditpublic company secretarial auditpaid up capital fifty croreturnover two hundred fifty croresecretarial auditor appointmentcompany secretary in practicesecretarial audit reportboard report annexure MR-3secretarial audit qualificationboard explanation qualificationsecretarial audit penaltysecretarial audit non compliancesecretarial audit checklistsecretarial audit documentationsecretarial audit standardsICSI secretarial standardssecretarial audit legal opinionsecretarial audit material subsidiarysecretarial audit annualsecretarial audit frequencysecretarial audit peer reviewsecretarial auditor eligibilitysecretarial audit scope expansionsecretarial audit fraud reportingAnuj Desai Associates secretarial audit
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.