Skip to content
Companies Act / Cost Audit

333. Cost Audit (Section 148): Applicability and Cost Records

Cost records and cost audit are two separate tests. A company can be required to maintain cost records without being required to have them audited—and the ₹35 crore, ₹50 crore, and ₹100 crore thresholds operate on different bases.

29 Oct 20263 min read

The Two-Test Architecture

Section 148 read with the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014 creates two distinct obligations: maintenance of cost records, and audit of those records. Rule 3 governs the records obligation for specified products and services in regulated (Table A) and non-regulated (Table B) sectors. Rule 4 governs the audit obligation, with separate thresholds for regulated and non-regulated sectors. Meeting the records test does not automatically trigger the audit test.

The ₹35 Crore Records Threshold

A company engaged in a specified product or service must maintain cost records if its overall turnover from all products and services was ₹35 crore or more in the immediately preceding financial year. The relevant turnover is overall turnover, not covered-product turnover. Once the threshold is crossed, the records obligation applies to the covered products, even if a particular covered product’s turnover is below ₹35 crore.

The Audit Thresholds

For regulated sectors, cost audit applies where overall turnover is ₹50 crore or more and covered-product or service turnover is ₹25 crore or more. For non-regulated sectors, the thresholds are ₹100 crore overall and ₹35 crore for the covered product or service. Both thresholds must be met, subject to the applicable exclusions. The audit threshold is not a function of the records threshold; a company can be above ₹35 crore for records but below the audit threshold.

The Forms and the Filing Sequence

Cost records are maintained in CRA-1. Where cost audit applies, the company appoints an eligible cost auditor and files CRA-2; the auditor reports in CRA-3; the company files CRA-4 within the prescribed period. The appointment requires board approval, and where the cost auditor’s remuneration exceeds the prescribed limit, shareholder approval by ordinary resolution is required.

The Classification Risk

The most common compliance failure is misclassification of a product or service against the Rule 3 tables. The tables use industry descriptions and, in some entries, Customs Tariff headings. A company with multiple business lines should prepare a product-and-service mapping, identify the covered entries, and retain the evidence supporting the classification. An industry label alone may be insufficient; the exact activity, product, service, or tariff heading matters.

Documentation for the Cost Audit File

The file should contain: the turnover computation for the preceding year; the product/service mapping; the board resolution appointing the cost auditor; the CRA-2 filing; the cost auditor’s CRA-3 report; the CRA-4 filing; and the cost records reconciliation. A file that contains only the CRA-3 report without the applicability working papers is incomplete for adjudication purposes.

Call to Action: For Section 148 applicability assessment, product mapping, or cost audit documentation review, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

Compliance Guidesection 148 cost auditcost records applicabilitycost audit thresholdCRA-1 cost recordsCRA-2 cost auditor appointmentCRA-3 cost audit reportCRA-4 cost audit filingregulated sector cost auditnon-regulated sector cost auditcost audit turnover threshold35 crore cost records50 crore cost audit100 crore cost auditcost auditor eligibilitycost audit applicability testcost records maintenancecost accounting recordscost audit exemptioncost audit penaltycost auditor fraud reportingcost audit report filing timelinecost audit board approvalcost audit shareholders approvalcost audit rules 2014Table A regulatedTable B non-regulatedcost audit product mappingcost audit service mappingcost audit prior year turnovercost audit classificationcost audit documentationcost audit legal opinioncost audit compliance calendarAnuj Desai Associates cost audit advisory
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.