Skip to content
Companies Act / Winding Up

386. Preferential Transactions in Winding Up: Look-Back Period

A preferential transaction is not void automatically. The liquidator must establish the elements—transfer to a creditor, preference over other creditors, and the look-back period—and the transferee has statutory defences.

29 Oct 20262 min read

The Statutory Framework

Sections 328 and 329 of the Companies Act govern preferential transactions in winding up. A preference is a transfer of property or payment to a creditor that gives that creditor a preference over other creditors. The transaction is void against the liquidator if it was made within the look-back period and the company was unable to pay its debts at the time.

The Look-Back Periods

The look-back period is six months for unrelated creditors and two years for related parties. The period runs from the date of the winding-up commencement. A transaction outside the look-back period is not avoidable as a preference, even if it favoured a creditor.

The Elements and the Defences

The liquidator must establish: a transfer of property; to a creditor; at a time when the company was unable to pay its debts; and within the look-back period. The transferee may defend on the ground that the transaction was in the ordinary course of business, that it was a contemporaneous exchange for value, or that it did not prefer the creditor over others.

The Practical Consequence

A preferential transaction that is avoided results in the restoration of the property or its value to the company. The liquidator may pursue the transferee for the value. The transferee should preserve the transaction documents and the evidence of the commercial rationale.

Call to Action: For preferential transaction defence, look-back period assessment, or liquidator avoidance proceedings, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

Compliance Guidepreferential transactions winding uplook back period preferentialsection 328 preferentialsection 329 look backwinding up preferential transactionliquidator avoidancepreferential transfer winding uprelated party preferentialsection 328 look backwinding up avoidance legal opinionAnuj Desai Associates preferential transaction defence
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.