Skip to content
NCLT / Scheme Jurisdiction

NCLT Scheme with Multiple States: Which Bench Has Jurisdiction?

A scheme involving companies registered in different states raises a bench-selection question. The general rule is that the NCLT bench with jurisdiction over the transferor company’s registered office hears the scheme—but the rule admits exceptions, and the choice can affect the stamp duty and the timeline.

29 Oct 20262 min read

The General Rule

The NCLT bench that has territorial jurisdiction over the company’s registered office hears the company’s scheme petition. In a scheme involving a transferor and a transferee registered in different states, the transferor company’s bench ordinarily hears the petition, because the transferor is the company whose assets and liabilities are being transferred. The transferee company may file a separate petition or an application for confirmation in its own bench.

The Transferor’s Bench as the Lead Bench

The practice that has emerged is that the transferor company’s bench is the lead bench, and the transferee company’s bench passes a consequential order. The lead bench conducts the convening of meetings, the scrutiny of the scheme, and the final sanction. The transferee bench’s order is necessary to give effect to the scheme in the transferee’s state.

The Section 419(3) Transfer

If the scheme is pending before a bench that does not have jurisdiction over the transferor, the President of the NCLT may transfer the case to the correct bench under Section 419(3). A party that objects to the bench’s jurisdiction should raise the objection at the earliest opportunity, because a belated objection may be treated as a waiver.

The Stamp Duty Consequence

The choice of bench can affect the stamp duty on the scheme order. The stamp duty is determined by the state in which the order is stamped, and the rates vary. The company should model the stamp duty in each relevant state before filing the scheme, because the bench selection may have a significant cost consequence.

The Practical Coordination

The company should file the scheme before the transferor’s bench, obtain the certified copy of the order, and then file it before the transferee’s bench for the consequential order. The two benches should be informed of each other’s proceedings to avoid conflicting directions.

Call to Action: For multi-state scheme bench selection, transferor–transferee coordination, or stamp duty modelling, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

Compliance GuideNCLT scheme multiple statesbench jurisdiction schemetransferor transferee different statesNCLT scheme jurisdictionsection 230 benchscheme registered office stateNCLT bench choice schememulti-state schemeNCLT jurisdiction conflictscheme bench transferAnuj Desai Associates multi-state scheme
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.