Skip to content
NCLT Scheme / Cost Audit

NCLT Scheme and Cost Auditor: New Applicability

A scheme can push the transferee across the cost audit threshold. The combined turnover and the covered products must be re-tested, and a cost auditor must be appointed if the merged entity falls within Section 148.

29 Oct 20262 min read

The Threshold Re-Test

The cost audit applicability under Section 148 depends on the overall turnover and the turnover of covered products or services. A scheme can change both. The transferee must recompute the turnover on a combined basis and determine whether the merged entity crosses the ₹35 crore records threshold and the ₹50 crore or ₹100 crore audit thresholds, depending on the sector.

The Appointment and Filing

If the merged entity is covered, the board must appoint a cost auditor, and the appointment must be filed with the ROC in Form CRA-2. The cost auditor’s report is filed in CRA-3, and the company files CRA-4. The scheme should provide for the appointment timeline so that the cost audit for the first post-merger year is not delayed.

The Records Transition

The transferor’s cost records for the pre-merger period remain relevant for the cost audit of that period. The transferee should obtain the transferor’s cost records and ensure that the cost auditor has access to them. A gap in the records can lead to a qualified cost audit report.

Call to Action: For post-scheme cost audit applicability assessment, CRA-2 filing, or records transition, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

Compliance GuideNCLT scheme cost auditorcost audit applicability schemecost records mergersection 148 cost auditcost auditor appointment schemecost audit threshold merged entityAnuj Desai Associates cost audit scheme
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.