Skip to content
NCLT / Scheme & Contracts

NCLT Scheme and Contractual Rights: The 'Transfer by Operation of Law' Principle

A scheme does not require novation of every contract. The NCLT’s order transfers the transferor’s contracts to the transferee by operation of law, and the counterparty cannot insist on a tripartite novation—unless the contract contains a negative covenant that the scheme cannot override.

29 Oct 20262 min read

The Contrast with Slump Sale

In a business transfer agreement or a slump sale, the transfer of contractual liabilities requires novation under Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act. Novation extinguishes the original contract and substitutes a new one, and it requires the counterparty’s consent. An NCLT-sanctioned scheme is different: the transfer occurs by operation of law, and the transferee steps into the transferor’s contractual position without the counterparty’s consent.

The Arbitration Clause

The Calcutta High Court has held that a successor to a merger transaction can invoke an arbitration clause when all rights and liabilities are transferred under the scheme. The transferee is not a stranger to the arbitration agreement; it claims “through” or “under” the original signatory, and the arbitration clause travels with the contract.

The Anti-Assignment Clause

The operation-of-law principle does not override an express anti-assignment clause in a contract. If the contract prohibits assignment without the counterparty’s consent, the scheme’s statutory vesting may not be effective to transfer the contract. The transferee should review the transferor’s key contracts for anti-assignment clauses and obtain the counterparty’s consent where required.

The Practical Documentation

The scheme should include a clause that transfers all contracts, rights, and liabilities of the transferor to the transferee. The transferee should notify the counterparties of the transfer and provide the NCLT order as evidence. The counterparties cannot refuse to perform on the ground that they were not parties to the NCLT proceeding, unless the contract contains a valid anti-assignment clause.

Call to Action: For scheme contractual transfer analysis, anti-assignment clause review, or arbitration clause succession, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

Compliance Guidescheme contractual rightstransfer by operation of lawNCLT scheme contractsnovation schemeautomatic transfer contractsscheme contract assignmentNCLT scheme arbitration clausescheme counterparty rightsAnuj Desai Associates scheme contracts
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.