Skip to content
Companies Act / Internal Controls

Internal Financial Controls (IFC): Directors' Responsibility Statement

The directors’ responsibility statement under Section 134(5) is not a recital; it is a certification that IFC has been laid down and is operating effectively. The audit committee’s IFC oversight and the auditor’s IFC reporting are the evidentiary supports for that certification.

29 Oct 20262 min read

The Statutory Certification

Section 134(5)(e) requires the directors’ responsibility statement to state that internal financial controls have been laid down and that such controls are adequate and operating effectively. The certification is signed by the board and is a personal statement of the directors, not a delegation to the auditor. A board that signs the statement without an IFC testing record is certifying without evidence.

The IFC Framework

The IFC framework should cover: the control environment; risk assessment; control activities; information and communication; and monitoring. The company should maintain a risk-control matrix that maps each significant financial-reporting risk to the control that mitigates it, the control owner, the testing frequency, and the test result. A matrix that lists controls without testing evidence is a design document, not an operating-effectiveness record.

The Audit Committee’s Oversight

The audit committee should receive the IFC testing report, the management’s remediation plan, and the status of open deficiencies. The committee should review whether the deficiencies are significant or material, and whether the remediation timeline is adequate. The committee’s minutes should record the specific deficiencies discussed and the agreed remediation dates.

The Statutory Auditor’s Reporting

For companies where the auditor is required to report on IFC, the auditor’s report must state whether the company has adequate IFC with reference to the financial statements. The auditor’s testing is not a substitute for the board’s certification. A board that relies solely on the auditor’s IFC report without its own testing record is not discharging the Section 134(5) responsibility.

The CEO/CFO Certification

For listed entities, the CEO and CFO must certify the IFC effectiveness. The certification should be supported by the IFC testing report and the management’s representation letter. A certification that is not backed by a testing record is a false certification risk.

Documentation for the Board

The board should receive: the IFC framework document; the risk-control matrix; the testing report; the remediation tracker; the audit committee’s recommendation; and the auditor’s IFC report. The board’s discussion should be minuted, including the specific deficiencies and the board’s direction on remediation.

Call to Action: For IFC framework design, testing documentation, or directors’ responsibility statement support, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

Compliance Guideinternal financial controlsIFC directors responsibilitysection 134(5) IFCIFC documentationIFC frameworkIFC testingIFC auditIFC matrixIFC risk control matrixIFC control testingIFC remediationIFC certificationIFC board responsibilityIFC audit committeeIFC statutory auditorIFC CEO CFO certificationIFC COSO frameworkIFC legal opinionAnuj Desai Associates IFC advisory
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.