Skip to content
Companies Act / Deposits Enforcement

349. Deposits: Penal Consequences of Default

A deposit default carries both civil and penal consequences. The penal rate of interest runs at eighteen per cent per annum, and the officers in default face imprisonment and fine that can extend to seven years and ₹2 crore.

29 Oct 20262 min read

The Section 76A Penalty

Contravention of Section 73 or Section 76 attracts Section 76A. The company is liable to a fine, and every officer in default is punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years and with fine which shall not be less than ₹25 lakh but which may extend to ₹2 crore. The penalty is not a purely monetary exposure; it includes the possibility of imprisonment.

The Penal Rate of Interest

Rule 17 of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 requires every company to pay a penal rate of interest of eighteen per cent per annum for the overdue period in the case of matured deposits, whether secured or unsecured. The penal interest is in addition to the contractual interest and runs until repayment.

The Section 75 Fraudulent Acceptance

Where the failure to repay is connected with the acceptance of deposits with intent to defraud depositors or for a fraudulent purpose, Section 75 applies. The consequence is a higher penalty and a fraud characterisation that can affect the directors’ disqualification and the company’s standing.

The NCLT Route

Depositors may approach the NCLT for an order directing repayment. A failure to comply with the NCLT order attracts further imprisonment and fine. The NCLT route is often faster than prosecution, and the company should treat an NCLT petition as a priority remediation trigger.

Remediation

The company should quantify the overdue deposits, compute the penal interest, repay or settle with the depositors, and file a compounding application. The application should include the repayment proof, the depositor consents, and the board resolution. A company that waits for prosecution loses the benefit of proactive compounding.

Call to Action: For deposit default quantification, NCLT response, or compounding application support, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

Compliance Guidedeposit default penaltysection 76A penaltydeposit repayment defaultdeposit default interestdeposit default compoundingdeposit default adjudicationdeposit default director liabilitydeposit default imprisonmentdeposit default finedeposit default legal opiniondeposit default remediationdeposit default case lawdeposit default NCLTdeposit default RBIAnuj Desai Associates deposit default defence
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.