Skip to content
Companies Act / Audit & Auditors

Auditor Removal (Section 140): Procedure and NCLT Approval

Removing an auditor before the expiry of the term requires NCLT approval. The board can initiate the process, but it cannot complete the removal—and the tribunal’s approval is not a formality.

29 Oct 20262 min read

The Pre-Expiry Removal Route

Section 140(1) permits the removal of an auditor before the expiry of the term only after obtaining the prior approval of the Central Government, which is now exercised by the NCLT. The company must apply to the NCLT in the prescribed form, and the application must be supported by the board’s resolution and the reasons for the proposed removal. The auditor must be given an opportunity of being heard.

The Board and Shareholder Steps

The board must first pass a resolution proposing the removal, specifying the grounds. The proposal must be placed before the shareholders in a general meeting. The shareholder resolution should be passed by ordinary resolution, and the notice must contain the statement of grounds. The NCLT application is made after the shareholder approval, and the tribunal’s order is the operative approval for the removal.

The Grounds

The grounds for removal must be substantive—for example, professional misconduct, failure to comply with the auditing standards, or a conflict of interest. A disagreement over accounting treatment is not, by itself, a ground for removal. The application should set out the specific instances and the evidence, and the auditor’s response should be placed before the tribunal.

The NCLT Hearing

The NCLT will hear the company and the auditor. The tribunal may direct the company to produce the audit files, the board minutes, and the audit committee’s recommendation. The tribunal’s order may approve the removal, reject it, or impose conditions. A company that proceeds with the removal before the tribunal’s order is in contempt.

The ADT-2 Filing

After the NCLT order, the company must file Form ADT-2 with the ROC within thirty days. The form should be accompanied by the tribunal’s order, the shareholder resolution, and the board resolution. A failure to file ADT-2 leaves the removal incomplete on the regulatory record.

The Audit Committee’s Recommendation

The audit committee should consider the proposed removal and record its recommendation. A board that proposes removal without the audit committee’s input, where the committee is required, has bypassed a governance filter. The committee’s minutes should reflect the specific concerns and the auditor’s response.

Call to Action: For auditor removal application drafting or NCLT approval strategy, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

Process Guideauditor removal section 140section 140(1) removalauditor removal NCLTNCLT auditor removalauditor removal procedureauditor removal board resolutionauditor removal shareholder approvalauditor removal special noticeauditor removal NCLT applicationauditor removal groundsauditor removal complianceauditor removal legal opinionauditor removal before expiryauditor removal after expiryauditor removal and ADT-2ADT-2 filingauditor removal penaltyauditor removal audit committeeAnuj Desai Associates auditor removal advisory
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.