Skip to content
Companies Act / Adjudication Appeals

360. Appeal Against Adjudication Order (Section 454(5)): Regional Director

The Section 454(5) appeal is not a rehearing de novo; it is a challenge to the adjudicating officer’s order on law, fact, or quantum. The sixty-day window is strict, and a delay requires a separate condonation application.

29 Oct 20263 min read

The Appeal Window

An appeal under Section 454(5) must be filed within sixty days from the date of receipt of the adjudicating officer’s order. The limitation is mandatory. An appeal filed after sixty days is dismissed unless the Regional Director condones the delay on sufficient cause being shown.

The Memorandum of Appeal

The appeal is filed in the prescribed form with the Regional Director, accompanied by the certified copy of the order, the grounds of appeal, and the supporting documents. The grounds should address: the absence of jurisdiction; the failure to give a hearing; the misapplication of the penalty provision; the excessive quantum; or the failure to consider the corrective action.

The Hearing and the Order

The Regional Director gives the parties an opportunity of hearing and may confirm, modify, or set aside the order. The Regional Director’s order is a reasoned decision and is subject to further challenge before the NCLT or the High Court, depending on the nature of the order.

The Consequence of Dismissal

If the appeal is dismissed, the adjudication order stands, and the ROC may initiate consequential action under Section 454(8) for non-payment. A company that has not paid the penalty during the appeal should be prepared to pay immediately upon dismissal.

Documentation

The file should contain: the adjudication order; the date of receipt; the appeal memorandum; the grounds; the hearing notes; the Regional Director’s order; and the payment challan if the penalty is confirmed. A company that has a strong corrective-action record should place it before the Regional Director as mitigation.

Call to Action: For Section 454(5) appeal drafting, condonation application, or Regional Director hearing representation, contact office@anujdesaiassociates.com or 9619456656. Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230.

以下为第361至390篇的第一批,共15篇(361–375),严格遵循你指定的Markdown块格式。每篇以---起始,包含完整前置字段,正文使用##二级标题,不使用对比表,SEO标签连续排列、逗号分隔,末尾嵌入统一联系方式。内容以《2013年公司法》条文、NCLT/NCLAT及最高法院近期裁判要旨为骨架,侧重构成要件、程序链条、证据标准与抗辩边界。

Process Guidesection 454(5) appealRegional Director appealadjudication appeal procedureappeal sixty daysappeal memorandumappeal condonationappeal hearingappeal orderappeal legal opinionappeal checklistAnuj Desai Associates adjudication appeal
Share

Related insights

Companies Act / Board Governance

Section 185 Loans to Directors: The 2023 Amendment and Its Impact

A technical breakdown of Section 185 after the 2023 amendment: the surviving prohibition, the special resolution gateway, and the documentation conditions that determine whether a director loan is defensible before the ROC or NCLT.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Treasury & Investment Compliance

Section 186 Loans and Investments: Calculating the 60%/100% Limits

How the 60%/100% outer limit actually works, why the higher figure governs, and the three-tier approval chain that determines when a board resolution is no longer sufficient for loans, guarantees, securities, and investments.

29 Oct 2026

Companies Act / Inter-Corporate Transactions

Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) and Section 186 Compliance

The ICD is not a standalone instrument. It is a Section 186 deployment that must satisfy the aggregate ceiling, the board-resolution-first rule, and the G-sec floor on interest—three conditions that are tested independently.

29 Oct 2026

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.