Skip to content
SEBI / Research Analysts

Limitations on Compensation of Research Analysts – What's Prohibited

A comprehensive guide on the limitations on compensation of Research Analysts, including what is prohibited and the review requirements.

25 Jul 20264 min read

The SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations, 2014 impose specific limitations on the compensation of Research Analysts (RAs) employed by research entities. These limitations are designed to ensure that RA compensation is not influenced by investment banking or brokerage activities. This article provides a comprehensive technical analysis of the compensation limitations.

Regulatory Basis

Primary Provision: Regulation 17

Regulation 17 provides:

(1) Research entity shall not pay any bonus, salary or other form of compensation to any individual employed as research analyst that is determined or based on any specific merchant banking or investment banking or brokerage services transaction.

(2) The compensation of all individuals employed as research analyst shall be reviewed, documented and approved annually by board of directors/committee appointed by board of directors of the research entity, which does not consist of representation from its merchant banking or investment banking or brokerage services divisions.

(3) The board of directors/committee appointed by board of directors of the research entity approving or reviewing the compensation of individual employed as research analyst shall not take into account such individual's contribution to the research entity's investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services business.

(4) An individual employed as research analyst by research entity shall not be subject to the supervision or control of any employee of the merchant banking or investment banking or brokerage services divisions of that research entity.

Prohibited Compensation Practices

1. Transaction-Based Compensation

Prohibition: Compensation based on specific merchant banking, investment banking, or brokerage services transactions.

Examples:

  • Bonus for assisting with an IPO
  • Commission for bringing in investment banking clients
  • Extra pay for a successful merger

2. IB/Brokerage Influence

Prohibition: Compensation review committee cannot have representation from IB/brokerage divisions.

Examples:

  • No IB head on the compensation committee
  • No brokerage head on the committee

3. IB/Brokerage Contribution

Prohibition: Compensation review cannot consider IB/brokerage contribution.

Examples:

  • Cannot consider how much IB revenue the RA generated
  • Cannot consider how much brokerage business the RA brought

4. IB/Brokerage Supervision

Prohibition: RAs cannot be subject to supervision or control of IB/brokerage employees.

Examples:

  • RA does not report to IB head
  • RA is not evaluated by brokerage head

Compensation Review Requirements

1. Annual Review

  • Compensation must be reviewed annually
  • Documented
  • Approved by board/committee

2. Independent Committee

  • Board of directors/committee
  • No representation from IB/brokerage divisions
  • Independent from IB/brokerage influence

3. No IB/Brokerage Consideration

  • Cannot take into account IB/brokerage contribution
  • Must focus on research quality
  • Must focus on compliance

Practical Implementation

Step 1: Establish Committee

  • Establish a compensation review committee
  • Ensure no IB/brokerage representation

Step 2: Define Review Process

  • Define the review process
  • Define the criteria
  • Document the process

Step 3: Conduct Annual Review

  • Review compensation annually
  • Document the review
  • Approve compensation

Step 4: Ensure Independence

  • Ensure RA independence from IB/brokerage
  • Ensure separate reporting lines
  • Ensure separate supervision

Common Compliance Gaps

1. Transaction-Based Compensation

Some research entities pay compensation based on transactions.

Solution: Ensure compensation is not based on transactions.

2. IB/Brokerage on Committee

Some research entities include IB/brokerage on compensation committee.

Solution: Ensure no IB/brokerage representation.

3. IB/Brokerage Consideration

Some research entities consider IB/brokerage contribution.

Solution: Do not consider IB/brokerage contribution.

4. IB/Brokerage Supervision

Some research entities have IB/brokerage supervising RAs.

Solution: Ensure separate supervision.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

1. Regulatory Action

SEBI may take action for non-compliance.

2. Monetary Penalties

SEBI may impose monetary penalties.

3. Suspension or Cancellation

SEBI may suspend or cancel registration.

Conclusion and How Anuj Desai & Associates Can Help

Compensation limitations are designed to ensure RA independence.

Anuj Desai & Associates offers specialized services to help research entities comply with compensation limitations:

  • Review of compensation practices
  • Establishment of review committees
  • Development of compensation policies
  • Compliance audit and advisory

Contact us today to ensure your compensation practices comply with SEBI requirements. Our team will guide you through the process.


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are advised to consult qualified professionals for legal and compliance matters. Anuj Desai & Associates is a SEBI compliance consulting firm based in India.


Compliance Guidecompensation limitationsRA compensationRegulation 17research analyst compensationcompensation prohibitionIB-based compensationbrokerage-based compensationRA compensation reviewboard committee compensationindependent compensation reviewAnuj Desai and AssociatesSEBI compliance consultantRA compliance expert
Share

Related insights

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.