Skip to content
GST / Input Tax Credit

ITC on Construction Expenses for Immovable Property: The Safari Retreats Impact

Complete guide to ITC on construction expenses for immovable property including the Safari Retreats judgment, its impact, and practical implications.

14 Aug 20264 min read

The eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on goods and services used for construction of immovable property has been a contentious issue under GST. The landmark Safari Retreats judgment by the Supreme Court has significantly clarified the legal position.

This comprehensive guide explains the ITC rules for construction expenses, the Safari Retreats judgment, and its practical implications.

The Legal Framework: Section 17(5)(c) and (d)

Section 17(5)(c)

Section 17(5)(c) blocks ITC on works contract services when used for construction of immovable property (other than plant or machinery).

Section 17(5)(d)

Section 17(5)(d) blocks ITC on goods or services received for construction of immovable property (other than plant or machinery).

The Safari Retreats Case: Background

The Facts

Safari Retreats Private Limited engaged in the construction of a shopping mall (for letting out). The company claimed ITC on the goods and services used for the construction.

The Issue

The authorities denied the ITC based on Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act. Safari Retreats challenged the denial, arguing that:

  • The restriction on ITC was unconstitutional
  • ITC should be allowed on construction intended for rental purposes

The Constitutional Challenge

Safari Retreats argued that provisions of sections 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) are violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court Judgment

The Verdict

On 3rd October 2024, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of the CGST Act.

Key Findings

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the provisions but provided important clarifications.

The Orissa High Court View

The Orissa High Court had earlier held that if the assessee is required to pay GST on the rental income arising out of the investment on which they have already paid GST, ITC should be allowed.

Supreme Court's Approach

The Supreme Court examined the eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on goods and services used for constructing immovable property, specifically a shopping mall.

Impact of the Safari Retreats Judgment

On ITC for Commercial Construction

The judgment has significant implications for:

  • Shopping mall developers
  • Commercial property developers
  • Businesses constructing property for rental purposes
  • Works contract service recipients

On Plant and Machinery

The exception for "plant or machinery" in Section 17(5)(c) and (d) remains important.

On Constitutional Challenges

While the constitutional validity of Sections 17(5)(c) and (d) was upheld, the judgment provides clarity on the scope of these provisions.

ITC on Construction: What Is Allowed and What Is Blocked

Blocked ITC

ITC is blocked on:

  • Works contract services for construction of immovable property (other than plant or machinery)
  • Goods and services for construction of immovable property (other than plant or machinery)

Allowed ITC

ITC may be allowed on:

  • Construction of plant or machinery
  • Construction where the property is used for further supply (in some cases)
  • Works contract services for repair and maintenance (not construction)

Practical Implications for Businesses

For Property Developers

  • ITC on construction costs for commercial properties remains blocked
  • Careful structuring is required for tax efficiency
  • Consider plant and machinery exceptions

For Businesses Renting Property

  • The Supreme Court has clarified the constitutional position
  • ITC on construction costs may not be available for rental properties

For Works Contract Service Providers

  • Understand the scope of Section 17(5)(c) and (d)
  • Determine whether services fall under "works contract"

Common Mistakes to Avoid

1. Assuming ITC Is Available on All Construction

ITC on construction of immovable property (other than plant or machinery) is generally blocked.

2. Misinterpreting the Safari Retreats Judgment

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d).

3. Not Considering Plant and Machinery Exception

ITC may be available on construction of plant or machinery.

4. Ignoring Repair and Maintenance Distinction

ITC on repair and maintenance (not construction) may be available.


Need help with ITC on construction expenses? Our expert team provides comprehensive advisory on the Safari Retreats judgment and its practical implications.

Contact Anuj Desai & Associates: šŸ“§ Email: office@anujdesaiassociates.com šŸ“ž Phone: 9619456656 🌐 Website: https://anujdesaiassociates.com šŸ”— LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ca-anuj-desai-122547230

Compliance GuideITC Construction Immovable PropertySafari Retreats ITCSection 17(5)(c) ITCSection 17(5)(d) ITCITC Shopping Mall ConstructionITC Works Contract ServicesITC Construction Rental PropertySafari Retreats Supreme CourtSafari Retreats JudgmentITC Immovable Property ConstitutionalitySection 17(5)(c) Constitutional ValiditySection 17(5)(d) Constitutional ValidityITC Plant Machinery Immovable PropertyITC Construction Letting OutITC Safari Retreats AnalysisITC Construction GSTITC Works Contract Plant MachineryITC Immovable Property RulesProfessional GST ServicesCA Firm ITC AdvisoryAnuj Desai AssociatesGST Compliance IndiaITC Construction GuideSafari Retreats CaseITC Immovable Property GuideITC Works Contract ServicesITC Construction Shopping MallITC Rental Income ConstructionITC Section 17(5)(c) GuideITC Section 17(5)(d) GuideITC Constitution Articles 14 19(1)(g)
Share

Related insights

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.