Skip to content
Direct Tax Code / Transfer Pricing

Auto Components Safe Harbour Margins — Core vs Non-Core Component Categories Explained

A comprehensive guide to auto components safe harbour margins under the DTC, explaining core vs non-core component categories, the 12% and 8.5% margins, and the 90% OEM sales test.

31 Jul 20266 min read

Auto component manufacturers in India face significant transfer pricing compliance obligations for their export transactions. The safe harbour rules under the Direct Tax Code (DTC) 2025 provide a valuable compliance simplification mechanism for eligible auto component manufacturers, with distinct margin thresholds for core and non-core components. This guide explains the core vs non-core classification, the safe harbour margins, and the 90% OEM sales test.

The Safe Harbour Framework for Auto Components

Section 167 — Statutory Basis

Section 167(1) provides that the determination of income referred to in section 9(2) or arm's length price under section 165 or 166 shall be subject to safe harbour rules. Section 167(2) empowers the Board to make rules for safe harbour.

Section 167(3) — Definition of Safe Harbour

Section 167(3) defines "safe harbour" as circumstances in which the income-tax authorities shall accept the transfer price or income declared by the assessee without detailed scrutiny.

Core Auto Components — Definition

Rule 86(c) — Core Auto Components

"Core auto components" means:

  • Engine and engine parts: piston and piston rings, engine valves and parts, cooling systems and parts, power train components
  • Transmission and steering parts: gears, wheels, steering systems, axles and clutches
  • Suspension and braking parts: brake and brake assemblies, brake linings, shock absorbers and leaf springs
  • Lithium-ion batteries for use in electric or hybrid electric vehicles

Significance of Lithium-Ion Batteries

The definition of core auto components has been expanded to encompass lithium-ion batteries for use in electric and hybrid electric vehicles. This reflects the growing importance of electric vehicles in India's automotive landscape and ensures that EV component manufacturers can benefit from the higher safe harbour margin.

Non-Core Auto Components — Definition

Rule 86(l) — Non-Core Auto Components

"Non-core auto components" means auto components other than core auto components. This classification is critical for determining safe harbour margins in the automobile sector.

Examples of Non-Core Components

  • Interior components (seats, dashboard, trim)
  • Exterior components (bumpers, body panels)
  • Electrical and electronic components
  • Fasteners and hardware
  • Rubber and plastic components
  • Aftermarket components

Safe Harbour Margins

Rule 89(2) — Safe Harbour Margins

The safe harbour margins for auto components are:

CategorySafe Harbour MarginOEM Sales Requirement
Core Auto Components12% of operating expense90%+ of turnover must be OEM sales
Non-Core Auto Components8.5% of operating expense90%+ of turnover must be OEM sales

Operating Profit Margin

The margin is calculated as the operating profit margin in relation to operating expense.

The 90% OEM Sales Test

OEM Sales Definition

Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) sales refer to sales of components to vehicle manufacturers for use in the production of vehicles. OEM sales are distinct from aftermarket sales (sales of components for replacement or repair) and spare parts sales.

Calculation

OEM Sales Percentage = (OEM Sales / Total Turnover) × 100

The 90% Threshold

To qualify for the safe harbour, at least 90% of the total turnover during the relevant tax year must be in the nature of OEM sales.

Practical Application

The 90% threshold must be met for each tax year in which the safe harbour is claimed. If the threshold is not met in any tax year, the safe harbour option may be invalid.

Comparison of Core vs Non-Core

AspectCore ComponentsNon-Core Components
Margin12% of operating expense8.5% of operating expense
ExamplesEngines, transmissions, brakes, lithium-ion batteriesInterior, exterior, electrical components
Strategic ImportanceHigher technological contentLower technological content
OEM Sales Requirement90%+90%+

Procedure for Safe Harbour

Rule 90 — General Procedure

  1. Form No. 49: The assessee shall furnish Form No. 49 to the Assessing Officer on or before the due date for furnishing the return of income
  2. Return of Income: The return of income for the relevant tax year is to be furnished on or before the date of filing Form No. 49
  3. Verification: The Assessing Officer shall verify whether the assessee is an eligible assessee and the transaction is an eligible international transaction
  4. Reference to Transfer Pricing Officer: If the Assessing Officer doubts the validity of the option, he shall make a reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer
  5. Order: The Transfer Pricing Officer shall, by order in writing, declare the option to be invalid or valid

Practical Compliance

1. Classify Components

  • Determine whether the auto components manufactured are core or non-core
  • For lithium-ion batteries, verify they are used in electric or hybrid vehicles

2. Monitor OEM Sales

  • Track OEM sales separately from other sales
  • Maintain records of OEM sales contracts
  • Identify customers that qualify as OEMs

3. Calculate OEM Sales Percentage

  • Calculate the OEM sales percentage for each tax year
  • Ensure the calculation is accurate and documented
  • Verify that the threshold is met

4. Exercise Safe Harbour Option

  • File Form No. 49 on or before the due date for furnishing the return of income
  • Ensure the return of income is furnished on or before the date of filing Form No. 49

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Invalid Option

If the 90% OEM sales test is not met or the margin threshold is not satisfied:

  • The safe harbour option may be invalid
  • The transfer price will be determined under the regular transfer pricing provisions

Penalties

Non-compliance may result in:

  • Penalty under Section 442 for failure to maintain documentation
  • Penalty under Section 457 for failure to furnish information

Expert Legal Guidance

Anuj Desai & Associates provides comprehensive legal advisory services on auto components safe harbour. Our direct tax experts help auto component manufacturers understand the core vs non-core classification, monitor compliance, and navigate the regulatory framework. We assist in eligibility assessment, Form 49 filing, and representation before income-tax authorities.


Disclaimer: This article provides general information and does not constitute legal advice. For specific guidance on auto components safe harbour or any other direct tax matter, please consult qualified legal professionals.


Need Expert Legal Guidance?

Navigating the complex auto components safe harbour framework requires experienced legal counsel. At Anuj Desai & Associates, we provide comprehensive direct tax advisory services, including:

  • Eligibility Assessment: Evaluation of safe harbour eligibility
  • OEM Sales Monitoring: Guidance on tracking and calculating OEM sales
  • Option Exercise: Assistance with Form No. 49 filing
  • Representation: Representation before Transfer Pricing Officers

Contact us for expert legal guidance on your auto components safe harbour matters.


Compliance Guideauto components safe harbour marginscore auto components safe harbournon-core auto components safe harbourauto component safe harbour 12%auto component safe harbour 8.5%OEM sales safe harbour autolithium-ion batteries safe harbourauto component TP safe harbourcore vs non-core auto componentsautomotive transfer pricing safe harbourOEM sales 90% testauto component safe harbour eligibilitycore auto components definitionnon-core auto components definitionauto component safe harbour conditionsautomotive OEM safe harbourauto component safe harbour guidecore auto components engine transmissionnon-core auto components TPauto component safe harbour expertautomotive transfer pricing complianceOEM sales test autoauto component safe harbour filingcore auto components lithium-ionnon-core auto components marginauto component safe harbour advisoryautomotive safe harbour compliancecore vs non-core auto components guideauto component safe harbour best practicesautomotive OEM margin requirements
Share

Related insights

Work with ADA

Ready to talk to an advisor?

Book a consultation and get a clear, considered view from a team that handles audit, tax, regulatory and cross-border work under one roof.